>>125764
What would they actually do?
I think, realistically speaking, they would never go to court over this, as the case doesn't exactly make them look good themselves, specially on a situation like Ruby's for example.
>your honor I as a mother should have exclusive rights to distribution of soft core NO THANKS of my daughter!
I don't think that would go very well and probably not what the DMCA was originally intended for kek.
>>125779
>self-censored simp
Incredibly pathetic. Hopefully I can kms before reaching that point.
>>125780
That on the other hand is a very smart way to go about it, weaponizing simps. Wouldn't surprise me if that's what's going on here, considering the way he puts it "Not happy", could imply a similar setup is at play.